More Perfect Union Accountability Network
More Perfect Union Accountability Network
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • About MPUAN
  • All the Rage
  • Newest Grievances
  • Fundamental Rights
  • Everything We've Got
  • Create Your Own Grievance
  • LEOAccountabilityByState
  • Government Actor Contacts
  • Sample Demand Letter

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

Police Violence toward Humanities Best Friends

Police Violence Toward Humanity’s Best Friends: The Predictable Cruelty of American Policing

Every year in the United States, police officers kill an estimated 10,000 dogs — that’s between 25 and 30 family pets every single day. The number comes from a Department of Justice official and has been cited by The Guardian and researchers at multiple universities [1]. Despite this staggering figure, there is no national database, no standardized reporting, and almost never any consequences. Most of these killings are not even investigated.

In most states, law enforcement officers receive no training whatsoever in safely handling dogs or distinguishing between a barking pet and a genuine threat [2]. The result is a predictable pattern of senseless violence, one that exposes the deeper moral and structural rot in American policing.

A System Built on Control

The origins of American policing lie not in community service but in control and domination. The first organized police forces in the South were slave patrols — groups of armed white men charged with hunting down escaped enslaved people and terrorizing Black communities [3]. Their mission was to maintain order through fear and violence.

That same logic persists today. The modern police force views itself not as a guardian of the public, but as a hammer — and every person and pet it encounters as a nail. Training instills the belief that every encounter could be deadly, that hesitation equals death, and that their survival outweighs everything else.

This “officer safety above all” mentality has metastasized into an unaccountable culture of fear, aggression, and impunity. When a police officer approaches your home, they’re trained to see your family dog not as your best friend, but as a potential threat — and to eliminate that threat immediately.

The Scale of the Violence

Research compiled by the Marshall Project and ScienceDirect shows that in many U.S. jurisdictions, the majority of police firearm discharges are directed at dogs rather than humans [4][5]. Officers shoot dogs more often than they shoot at people — and these shootings cluster in low-income and nonwhite neighborhoods, the same communities over-policed and under-protected in every other aspect of American life [6].

Dogs are often killed even when restrained, fleeing, or showing no signs of aggression. Puppies, Chihuahuas, Shih Tzus, and even cats have been shot under the official justification that they posed “an imminent threat.” The absurdity is self-evident, yet it’s legally protected because dogs are considered property, not living beings with emotional value [7].

In legal terms, shooting a dog counts as “property damage,” not cruelty or homicide. That means the death of your companion animal carries the same legal weight as breaking your television.

The Psychological Problem Behind the Badge

Beyond training failures, there is a psychological dimension to this violence. Research published by PsyPost in 2024 explores psychopathic personality traits within law enforcement, revealing how traits like low empathy, impulsivity, dominance, and lack of remorse can influence officer behavior [8].

These traits are not rare among police — in fact, they’re often rewarded. The ability to suppress empathy and act decisively without hesitation is misinterpreted as strength. Combine that with the institutional message that officers are under constant threat, and you’ve created the perfect storm: individuals predisposed to aggression operating within a system that glorifies it.

As one California defense attorney wrote, “Psychopaths know how to avoid responsibility, yet they crave dominance and control… In law enforcement, they wield power without empathy and leave a trail of devastation they never acknowledge.” [9]

That description could easily fit the officers in countless dog-killing cases across the country.

Case Studies in Cruelty

In El Paso, Texas, Border Patrol agents shot a Rottweiler named Chop after his owner had locked him safely in the bathroom for their protection. They opened the door, released him, and killed him anyway — leaving him to die on the kitchen floor as his family screamed for help [1].

In Sturgeon, Missouri, an officer gunned down a 13-pound blind and deaf Shih Tzu named Teddy — a pet who posed no threat and had just escaped his yard. The officer later laughed when questioned by the owner. His department found no wrongdoing [5].

And in Grant County, New Mexico, a deputy forcibly took a rescued baby rabbit from another officer — threatening him with a taser — before hurling the animal against a patrol car and killing it. The act was recorded on video, yet the deputy remained on paid administrative leave for months [10].

These are not anomalies. They are expressions of a systemic pathology — a profession that attracts those who crave control, trains them to see threats everywhere, and shields them from consequence when they destroy innocent life.

The Legislative Vacuum

Only five states — California, Colorado, Illinois, Tennessee, and Texas — require police to receive any training in handling dogs [1]. In the other forty-five, no such requirement exists.

Meanwhile, qualified immunity protects officers from civil liability, and internal investigations are handled by the same departments that commit the violence. There is no federal oversight, no uniform data collection, and no public accountability.

This vacuum allows animal killings to continue unchecked. As long as police are legally permitted to shoot without consequence, every bark can become a death sentence.

The Hammer and the Nails

Police officers are trained to see the world through the narrow lens of threat assessment. They are the hammer; we — citizens, families, and our animals — are the nails.

A profession that fears everything it encounters will eventually destroy everything it touches. Our dogs are the collateral damage of a system that prioritizes self-preservation over service, control over compassion, and fear over humanity.

What Must Change

  1. Mandatory training: Every law enforcement agency in the country must implement evidence-based dog-encounter training programs to teach officers humane, non-lethal handling techniques.
     
  2. Transparency: Every police shooting — human or animal — must be publicly reported and recorded in a federal database.
     
  3. Accountability: Officers who kill animals without justification must face criminal charges and termination, not administrative leave.
     
  4. Legal reform: Dogs should no longer be classified merely as property. The law must recognize their sentience and emotional value.
     

These are minimal, basic steps toward decency. Our public servants are paid by us. We have every right to know what they are doing — and every right to demand justice for the lives they take.

Conclusion

When police kill a family’s dog, they don’t just take a life — they destroy a bond that represents love, safety, and trust. These killings expose a truth that runs through American law enforcement: it is a system built on dominance, not protection.

Until that system changes — until we force transparency, demand accountability, and retrain those entrusted with power — our “public servants” will keep killing humanity’s best friends.

Sources

  1. The Guardian – “Police kill thousands of dogs each year in America” (2019): https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2
     
  2. Trace: University of Tennessee – “Police Encounters with Dogs” (PDF): https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewc
     
  3. Mapping Police Violence: https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/
     
  4. The Marshall Project – “Police Dogs and Violence” (2020): https://www.themarshallproject.org/20
     
  5. ScienceDirect – “Police Use of Force Against Dogs” (2021): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science
     
  6. The Appeal – “Police Dogs: Origins and Abuse” (2020): https://theappeal.org/police-dogs-ori
     
  7. American Pet Products Association: https://americanpetproducts.org/indus
     
  8. PsyPost – “Psychopathy in Policing” (2024): https://www.psypost.org/psychopathy-in-policing-how-certain-traits-influence-attitudes-and-behaviors/
     
  9. California: State of Collusion (Blog post by defense attorney, 2024).
     
  10. Southern Drawl Law (YouTube Transcript, 2024).

Police Violence Against Pets: all dogs are good dogs

Cops can't stop killing dogs, and here's why...

Be sure to stop by:

 https://www.youtube.com/@dog_rates

thank him for shining a light on these stories, doing the research, and sharing.

John Bryan, The Civil Rights Lawyer, talks about what happened to Teddy

Be sure to stop by:

https://www.youtube.com/@thecivilrightslawyer

thank him for shining a light on these stories, and helping make change happen.

John White, at Southern Drawl Law, exposes animal cruelty by Deputy...

Be sure to stop by:

https://www.youtube.com/@southerndrawllaw

thank him for shining a light on these stories, and helping make change happen.

Recognizing Psychopaths in Positions of Power

Read the blog post from California Lawyer and attorney John Tully, whose career has made the ability to recognize dangerous people imperative, and has refined his ability to do so.

Read the Study:

 Moore, Hunter N., "Psychopathy and Police Officers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Relationship Between Psychopathic Traits and Police Work Across Temporal Factors" (2020). CUNY Academic Works.
https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_etds/162 

NO PRINTER, NO STAMP, NO PROBLEM... SEND A LETTER

Send a letter to the POST commission in your state!

 Subject: Training for Law Enforcement MUST include extensive training for animal encounters.


Dear [Find your Relevant Organization for Police Officer Training and Standards here],

 

I am writing as a deeply alarmed citizen, taxpayer, and human being to demand immediate reform in the training standards you oversee. Every year in this country, police officers kill an estimated 10,000 dogs — that’s 25 to 30 beloved family pets shot to death every single day. These are not wild threats or aggressive attackers. They are therapy dogs, companions, best friends, and family members. They are “humanity’s best friends,” and yet under your current training standards, their lives mean less than property.

Let’s be clear: this is not about “split-second decisions.” It’s about a systemic failure of training that your agency allows to continue. Forty-five states still do not require any instruction on how to safely interact with dogs. Officers are not taught to recognize body language, defuse fear, or use nonlethal alternatives. Instead, they’re trained to treat every movement as a threat and to protect themselves at all costs — even if that cost is a wagging tail or a frightened bark.

This is barbaric. It is cowardly. And it is a stain on every department you certify.

Your Commission has the power — and the moral duty — to change this. I am demanding the following:

  1. Mandatory canine encounter training for all law enforcement officers under your certification authority.
     
  2. Annual refresher requirements on humane handling and nonlethal response.
     
  3. Public tracking and reporting of all officer-involved animal shootings, made accessible to taxpayers.


These changes are not radical. They are the bare minimum of accountability in a profession funded and legitimized by the public. If your officers are truly “here to serve and protect,” then start by protecting the innocent lives that rely on us for safety.

The American people are watching. We are paying for this violence with our taxes, our heartbreak, and our trust — and we are done being silent about it.

With Urgency,

[Your Name]
Citizen, Tax Payor, and Patriot

NO PRINTER, NO STAMP, NO PROBLEM... SEND A LETTER

Send a letter to the lawmakers your state!

Subject: Legislation Needed to End Police Violence Toward Dogs and Ensure Accountability


To [Find the Lawmaker you want to contact here],


It should shock every moral conscience in this country that American police officers kill an estimated 10,000 dogs each year — and almost none are disciplined, charged, or even investigated. That’s up to thirty dogs a day. Thirty family members. Thirty innocent lives extinguished at taxpayer expense, under the banner of “public safety.”

There is no federal database tracking these killings. There is no state oversight. There is no justice. Most states do not require a single hour of training on how to handle a frightened or territorial dog without resorting to deadly force. And because dogs are legally classified as “property,” their deaths carry no more legal consequence than denting a car door.

This is not an oversight — it’s complicity. It’s the result of decades of legislative indifference to an institutional culture that trains officers to view everything and everyone as a threat.

We need law, not platitudes. I am calling on you, as an elected representative of the people, to take the following actions immediately:

  1. Pass legislation mandating canine-encounter and de-escalation training for every law enforcement officer in this state.
     
  2. Require public reporting of all police shootings — including those involving animals — in an accessible statewide database.
     
  3. Eliminate qualified immunity protections in cases of unjustified animal killings.
     
  4. Recognize dogs as sentient companions under the law, not mere property, so that their deaths carry real civil and criminal consequences.
     

Our dogs are not collateral damage. They are members of our families — trusted, loving beings who depend on us for protection. When law enforcement kills them without cause, it is not an accident. It is the predictable result of systemic negligence.

I urge you to act now. Every day you delay, another family’s best friend dies at the hands of a public servant who faces no consequences.


With Urgency,


[Your Name]
Citizen, Tax Payor, and Patriot

Our Goal at More Perfect Union Accountability Network

Our Vision

This platform doesn’t just connect individuals to government — it builds collective momentum. With every mailed letter, the pressure grows. With every update to the counter, the will of the people becomes harder to dismiss. In a digital age where real voices are often buried by algorithms and inbox filters, we’re bringing civic engagement back into the physical world — where it has weight, friction, and undeniable presence.

Our only goal is to facilitate this objective by making it easier to exert pressure using physical paper to express dissatisfaction when the government actors that we pay to serve us, are extorting, abusing, and violating the rights of WE THE PEOPLE. If you are so inclined to print and mail this yourself, please feel free to do this. We are not gatekeepers, only facilitators! If you feel the weight of this logistical challenge, for less than the price of adding air to your tires, we will: print, fold, stuff, stamp, and USPS mail your grievance on your behalf.


All pressure is good pressure, feel free to copy and paste our grievance into an email if you're not concerned with exerting the physical weight of a paper document on your public servants.

Copyright © 2025 More Perfect Union Accountability Network - All Rights Reserved.


FAIR USE NOTICE: The videos and other contextual material linked within mpuaccountabilitynetwork.com may be protected by copyright and/or may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. 

Powered by

  • About MPUAN
  • LEOAccountabilityByState
  • Government Actor Contacts